Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 68
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    102
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    So I was going along -- break for holidays, checking into forum after weeks.......was going to read a little and BAM a thread I can't resist!!

    A'isha and other experts: here is my question (and sorry if this is not exactly in line w/ what y'all are pointing out) but could some one t4ell me why in this modern age some belly dancers who "want to be respected" don't cover up a little? Do jiggling boobs gain you credibility? Ballet dancers don't let all hang out, most times.

    Loo,k I don't want to be a stick in the mud or fuddy duddy and I am not extremely church-y etc though spirituality is very important -- I am mostly secular but just find that some dancers (esp some "well endowed") could do themselves better or would for me come across as better dancers if they had just a tad less flesh showing. Bellys I understnad can be part of the dance (although I love some of those Egyptian style costumes that are ful length evening dress w/ maybe a slit to knee or so) -- That for me is so much more elegant than "sexy"-supposedly skimpy (esp tops), and for me gives the dancer much more credibility. As they say for a "family friendly" presentation. Of course if one is performing in a club or somewhere where they wer hired for their overt more immodest costume, so be it, but I question in this discusion why I have not seen (have not read all 10 pages) but isn't it so extreemely obvious that for those who want to be "accepted" and not looked down on (as with normal street or work clothes), you can't have your private parts showing?

    To me it does not take away from artistry of the dance at all, not to have flesh showing.

    But so interesting to me that someone who is such an honest to goodness class act (Suhaila - whether you like her style or not, I find her a non-endingly elegant woman and dancer) could wear almost anythiung and it would not affect the incredible artistry or elegance of their dance that shows, but for a less expert dancer it seems to me even more important not to have the audience thinking the person was hired, or is dancing to show off their body, and the way to do that is cover up a bit, at least cleavage, so that the audience focusses on your dancing and not on your skin.

    Does this strike a chord wi/ anyone? I aspire to start performing soon but as I never ever, even in evening dress (I am just someone who could never feel comfortable with cleavage showing whether on the street in public or evening dress even) will show other tha n a modest amount -- such as w/ a typical but not very revealing bikini top for instance....

    What does that have to do w/ religion? I don't feel you have to be a prude or nun just to want to keep your image a more general audience rated and thereby in our modern world gain credibility rather than insist on following those dancers who make it a standard costume to really emphasize cleavage, etc slit up to there, etc. Somehow I also feel if those of us who want to be "accepted" agreed to follow this might just have an easier time 'selling" this dance form to a general audience (as w/ ballet for instance as an example) as selling dance and art rather than skin and "sexiness", we'd have an easier time of it --

    Pls forgive me if this sounds harsh, but I have a hard time understanding some who may moan about not being "accepted", or being looked down on, and go on stage w/ so much skin showing, no wonder people would equate BD w/ strippers, etc -- I'm not saying any of on forum are that I am just saying that if we came across as more serious about this dance, public might take dancers more seriously, too. And BD might have better credibility as a dance form, instead of being seen more as a type of vaudeville.... Of course to each their own -- and where they are performing...........(I like to watch any of it, anywhere, as long as good dance technique, taste, etc)

    Sorry so long but what do you others think and what is your practice -- ? Does anyone else feel this way, that we are responsible for how we are perceived by public? (this seems so obvious yet nearly all BD seem to insist on showing lots of skin -- again in nightclub and for a very gutsy, excellent dancer no problem -- but for those of us who need all the cr4edibility we can get, I wish (es[p as a woman) there could be less skin showing in BD, not more -- (I am a slender body-type but still, being more modest to me is more elegant and artistic than the other way...) --


    Happy New Year, all!!! Ludmilla

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    35
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Hi ludmilla

    You know, I think that we can ask to be accept and wear costume that show a lot of skin. Modern belly dance is that, and showing skin, doesn't mean "sexy and easy girl". If you don't want to show a lot of your body, it's your right, but can we asked to be accepted as a woman ( and this mean our brain and our body) and as a dancer? Can people accept your body and your skin, and your hips and your breasts even if there is not a lot of clothe on it? Why should we be afraid of a bit of flesh? Why should we be turned on when we see belly and shoulders? People should learn that we all have a body and skin, and the modern costume, even if there are sexy, are a part of the show and the dance and it's a form of art too.

    There is nothing more beautiful (and I'm a woman, not a pervert guy^^) than a woman that accept herself and her body enough not to be afraid of showing it, no matters her weight, her age or the color of her skin

    Just another thing, religions are generally denigrate the body, saying that the soul is the most important. Just think of it. You can believe in any god you want, but remember that religions are most controlled by humans, and humans are not perfect ^^ Just think of it . (and i'm not asking you to become a sexy woman, half nude wherever you go lol. It's just my reply to your question )

  3. #3
    V.I.P. Yasmine Bint Al Nubia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Akron, Ohio
    Posts
    1,160
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Whew Ludmilla ,That must have been a brainstorm 'cause I had to read it twice to understand it.
    In Oriental Dance, there are many ways to costume the dancer. IMO it would depend on the dance style and music i.e. folkloric styles vs.cabaret styles vs tribal styles.
    Cabaret styles depend on the glittering bedlah to show off the moves and flow with the music. Again IMO the costume should flatter the dancer, but can you expect one to dress with style if they are a slob in real life? Frankly, I think people select costumes based on their everyday clothing choices. You know how women always ask "Do I look fat in this?' maybe dancers need to ask "Do I look sleazy in this?'
    Yasmine

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    414
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Ballet dancers and members of elite contemporary dance groups frequently show a great deal more skin than I do. In fact, I've seen many a performance where the dancers are nude or nearly nude. (eg http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/..._470x311,0.jpg, link is worksafe) So I fail to see why me showing my belly and some cleavage makes me less respectable than they are.

    The reasons belly dancers get less respect are:

    1) We are entertainers, not fine artists.
    2) We are associated with "foreign", "exotic" concepts and all the associated orientalist hoo ha that goes with them.
    3) We are mostly female.
    4) There is a historical connection in the West (at least in the US) between belly dance and burlesque or vaudeville, making it part of a populist tradition not a "fine art" tradition.
    Last edited by Zumarrad; 01-06-2007 at 09:35 AM.

  5. #5
    V.I.P. Aisha Azar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pacific Northwest USA
    Posts
    5,313
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Showing skin

    Dear Ludy,
    I believe that if a person has a lovely body and dances well in it, then there is nothing wrong with a revealing costume. There is a dancer named Rishi in who lives in the Seattle area that I costumed for several years and I definately played up her body because it was really beautiful! She was a wonderful dancer and still is!
    What I hate is when people who do not have great bodies costume themselves as if they did. The idea of the costume is to enhance the character (and in dance, also the movement), and to hide flaws and play up assets, all reflecting the concept, in this case, of belly dance. Belly dance is supposed to be a flirtatious, sensuous, sexy dance... there is no way around that. The costume reflects that.
    However, when a person who is too skinny, too fat, built up with huge breasts on a teeny, tiny frame, has stretch marks hanging out all over the place, etc, does not costume to hide flaws and enhance the positive, then it can look just gross. This is especizlly true if the dancer is not relying on her natural sexiness, but getting into porn star mode. ( Of course, i would feel the same way about a dancer with a perfect body who did the "sex kitten" thing!!)
    When I was younger, I used to be able to wear pretty skimpy little costumes and I sometimes did with no apologies. Now I am older and MUCH fatter. I have changed my costuming to fit the body that I have now. I HOPE that it enhances my dance, as opposed to me just ignoring all my extra wieght, and costuming as I did in my 20s, 30s and even into my 40s.
    Regards,
    A'isha

  6. #6
    Super Moderator Shanazel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Rocky Mountains USA
    Posts
    15,683
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    If ballet dancers have much to hang out in the first place, they probably get fired, given that dance's insistence on adolescent bodies and adult legs.

    Exposed flesh only distracts me from the dance when I find myself wondering how long it is going to be before the dancer's assets pop out of her or his costume. Prior to the worldwide controversy over Kaia's sexually explicit performance, I saw her dance in Cheyenne, of all places. I took a very good workshop from her, enjoyed it and her very much, but almost lost my teeth when I saw her perform that night. If I had a butt that looked that good bare, perhaps I wouldn't mind flashing my audience, but trying to figure out how in the hell that skirt was staying on her body at all overwhelmed any attention I might have otherwise paid to her dance.

    A truly good dancer may be able to mesmerize an audience even if she's wearing a burlap bag (sequined, of course), but I prefer to see a costume enhance the dance and the dancer, not distract from them. Of course, then we get into the argument about how what distracts me may not distract anyone else in the world... at the same show Kaia performed in, an uneven hem on a skirt of unbecoming length on a different dancer dismayed me almost as much as Kaia's exposed bottom.
    "Well, now that we have seen each other," said the unicorn " if you'll believe in me, I'll believe in you."

  7. #7
    V.I.P. Kharmine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Foot of the Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    1,970
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I agree, Shanazel.

    There is a hilarious old song by Tom Lehrer called "Smut," that says "When correctly viewed, everything is lewd!"

    The focus for a belly dancer should be on how well she dances, titillation being a side effect, depending on how it's viewed. (After all, there will always be someone who finds that sequined burlap sack sexier than the bra 'n' belt look, go figure.)

    But for a burlesque entertainer it's all about deliberate titillation, sexy moves in a fancy costume being the vehicle.

    When one has trouble telling a belly dancer apart from a burlesque performer, something is getting lost. Wear "dental floss" and that shimmy is gonna convey a whole different message than a filmy skirt.

  8. #8
    V.I.P. Aisha Azar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pacific Northwest USA
    Posts
    5,313
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Skin, etc.

    Dear Group,
    Many of the mechanics of belly dance are not conducive to showing huge chunks of haunch. Usually I am not distracted by too much skin, but it does depend on what area of the body we are discussing. I see that in recent years, the Egyptian dancers are starting to show a LOT of cleavage. It looks really good to me most of the time. On the other hand, the massive thighs of Suheir Zaki sticking out of her full circle skirts was not an appealing look to me, and she is my favorite dancer along with Mouna and Randa. I also have never liked Hayertum's doughy looking body. (However, these things might be really attractive to some other people....) To me, lewd often has less to do with sexual content than it does with the over all look. Mouna is sexy just standing there, for example, but Sahar Hamdi is lewd when she is standing there wearing twice as much as Mouna. Different person, different aura, different mode of psychic expression, because often lewd is about who one is, not what one is wearing.
    Regards,
    A'isha

  9. #9
    Administrator Salome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pac NW, USA
    Posts
    3,071
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludmilla View Post
    but could some one t4ell me why in this modern age some belly dancers who "want to be respected" don't cover up a little? Do jiggling boobs gain you credibility? Ballet dancers don't let all hang out, most times.

    Sorry so long but what do you others think and what is your practice -- ? Does anyone else feel this way, that we are responsible for how we are perceived by public? (this seems so obvious yet nearly all BD seem to insist on showing lots of skin -- again in nightclub and for a very gutsy, excellent dancer no problem -- but for those of us who need all the cr4edibility we can get, I wish (es[p as a woman) there could be less skin showing in BD, not more -- (I am a slender body-type but still, being more modest to me is more elegant and artistic than the other way...) --
    Perception of a dance style, I think, has very little to do with the costumes but everything to do with attitude toward that dance style in a given culture.
    Take for instance ballet, ballroom, modern... I've seen plenty of anatomy - semi-nude, costumes that outline EVERYTHING, or highly provocative costuming in these genres. Yet these dance styles are now viewed by our culture as respected art - so nudity or costuming that leaves nothing or very little to the imagination doesn't lower its status.

    I don't think modest costuming is what is going to impact and change society's attitude toward Oriental dance. It has to go deeper than what one is wearing.

  10. #10
    V.I.P. Moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    3,769
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by A'isha Azar
    I believe that if a person has a lovely body and dances well in it, then there is nothing wrong with a revealing costume. ... What I hate is when people who do not have great bodies costume themselves as if they did.
    Excuse me?????????
    I really hope I understood you wrong, cause what I understood is: "beautiful" women may wear whatever they want as long as they don't go as far as looking as porn stars, but women that are "too fat" or lack other beauty ideals should hide themselves within their clothes...

    Beauty is a matter of taste!!! In my opinion, if a less "beautiful" woman wants to wear a very revealing costume, she has as many right to do so as a woman who has more of todays beauty ideals. And I personally don't like extremely revealing costumes no matter what the dancer's body looks like.
    Personally, I don't have problems with a little cleavage or a lot of bare belly showing, but I don't like a lot of bare leg showing because I think the dance looks nicer and the movement are more mysterious when the legs are less visible. I don't really like extremely revealing costumes because then a lot of less experienced oudience only see the bare skin and not the beautiful dance. It leads to more girls who know nothing about the dance thinking bellydance is all about being sexy, and I think sexy and sensual is not the same. Women can be beautiful and sensual in less revealing clothes too.
    In my opinion it's also not "the more nude, the sexier". I have some nude pictures on my wall which I think are beautiful and sensual, but not sexy.
    I think it's just a matter of taste. I like the costumes in the picture showing on the top of the forum, but not the short "normal" dresses combined with heals some dancers are wearing nowadays.

Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •