Do you consider it a folk dance?

Salome

Administrator
Greetings members,

As I was watching the dance styles defined video listed in another thread there is a little section at the end where Morocco says "it [belly dance] was and is a folk dance".

This isn't the first time I've heard Morocco make that statement. I definitely respect her vast knowledge in the field, she is a treasure trove of information.
And who am I to disagree with her!? :D

But on this statement... I consider Oriental dance a performance art, albeit ethnically and culturally specific, but not a folk dance. My understanding of a folk dance is a style of dance that originates among ordinary people and is traditional to their culture, community, or country. A dance done among ordinary people, 'non-professionally' and often spontaneously (in the sense that the dancing isn't an orchestrated performance) usually without a special costume. Like Baladi or debke...

What are your thoughts? Do you consider Oriental dance a folk dance?
 

Aisha Azar

New member
Folk dance?

Dear Salome,
I feel that while Belly dance has its roots in folkloric dances, it is not a folkloric dance in itself, but has moved into the realm of entrtainment art, or performance art.
I think a good comparison would be Tap in America, which definately came from folkloric roots, but changed dramatically as the people moved from the country to the city, and eventually became a professional dance form.
This change from the agraraian environment to the urban environment changed the meaning, feeling and even the movement style of these dances and put them to a new and different use.
I think this is true in many dances that start out as folkloric dance, but make that change when displaced from their natural environments.
Regards,
A'isha
 

Shanazel

Moderator
I agree with A'isha, and since she put it very well, I won't try to say the same thing in different words. I do tend to teach belly dance as much as a social dance as a performance art since most of my students are not interested in dancing in public beyond the occasional recital and student night. At least twice a year, I host a party that emphasizes just getting together to dance for and with each other. We have a blast. Before television and other lesser forms of entertainment evolved to plague civilization, people got together to make their own music dance, and this is my contribution to encouraging the custom.
 

Aaeesha

New member
I agree that it is now more of a performance art, but it is strongly rooted in the folk dances of the region. There are a lot of dancers out there who really strive to acheive the folk root in their dancing in which case, I think that it could potentially change the descriptor of the dance style. Raqs sharki, bellydance, or whatever name you prefer to call it, has been moderized to fit under the entertainment catagory as it is perceived by the general public.
 

Aisha Azar

New member
Folk dance?

Dear Group,
I think I should perhaps elaborate and say what I presume happened with the evolutionary process from the country to the stage. I think that even though Badia Masabni gets the "credit" if you will, for sort of inventing belly dance, I think this was already happening among the people in the cities... and she just took the new and evolving dance from the house to the stage and made it entertainment as well as pastime.
I have no proof of this; it is just my theory, based on what has happened in other countries, to other folk arts as people moved into the more sophistocated city ( or court) environment and brought their own dances, songs, poetry and other folk art forms along with them. That, along with the fact that Arabs are very into creating from what came before them, makes me believe it's what happened with belly dance.
Regards,
A'isha
 
Hi Everyone, I have the "American Dancer" DVD, from which those clips appeared from on youtube(what would we do without youtube?):eek: . Morrocco's comments at the end IMO serves to remind us of the folkloric foundation of the dance. To me, it is both a performance art which requires dedication and respect for the native cultures as well as a folloric dance to be enjoyed by ordinary people.
Many of the students at our school is put off (initially) about perfroming too, so I try to emphasize the folkloric elements and sensibilities so they can appreciate the rich complexity the dance offers.
Yasmine
 

Aisha Azar

New member
Folkloric

Dear Yasmine,
At the folkloric level, or the level where non-professional people get up and dance at parties, etc, the dance is really more Raqs Shaabi" or "Dance of the people". It often has some movements and attitudes in common with belly dance, but is not as complex or polished.
Regards,
A'isha
 
Last edited:

sedoniaraqs

New member
I think it all depends on how you circumscribe whatever you call the dance -- do you call the stage version the same as the non stage version?

Personally, I think it helps the unitiated understand the cultural context of the dance if it is labeled as a stage-version of a folkdance.

Sedonia
 

samsied

New member
I agree with all of you. It kind of depends on how you define the dance. I think of staged Oriental Dance as a performing art with folkloric and folk roots. I have heard someone (I think Helene Eriksen but possibly others) diferentiate "folkloric" dance as staged/performance art versions of folk dances and "folk" dances as the dances of the ordinary people.

I have had an "Arabic Dance" (as she defines the dance) who taught mainly as a folk dance. She didn't give advice about performance presentation and talked about beledi and shaabi a lot. I am not sure how culturally authentic her "folk" version was as she did correct technique (for her I posed my arms and hands too much) and much of the technique was similar to other classes that were more performance oriented. A lot of dancers in this area had no interest in performing and simply enjoyed dressing up for haflas and improvising the dance moves to arabic pop music. This was my fourth teacher and I found this a little pecular since I was use to a more performance-oriented perspective. It was lovely to be involved with this dance as a social dance, but it seemed like we were basically dancing "Oriental" (or maybe a little "beledi") as a social dance. Does that make it a folk dance? Or does it need to have the cultural context to count as a folk dance? When I took a couple of workshops in beledi, shaabi, debke and khaleegy they seemed very different (and much looser or more individual in technique), so I am not sure many Arabs would have seen what we were doing as their social/folk dance.

I know a lot of dancers perform folk dances or the staged folkloric dances and the more glamourous staged versions have evolved from the social and folk dances. So I guess the answer depends on which aspect of this dance Rocky was referring to and how a folk dance is defined.
 

tim ema

New member
This is a very interesting discussion!

In my short time "getting into" bellydance, I have been approaching it as a "catch-all" term that included both family/village/folk branches of the danceform and the professional/choreographed branches.

Personally, it seems to me saying "bellydance" or "Oriental dance" is kind of like saying "Celtic dance". It includes the local people at the pub dancing for fun and a big production like "Riverdance". When I watch "Riverdance" I personally don't think I'm watching a folk dance, NOR do I feel angered that they have "diluted" or "contaminated" a folk dance. It is a home/family/village dance taken to another venue and adapted TO that venue to shine its brightest in that venue.

It is the nature of all cultural things; dances, songs, language, customs; to evolve WITH the living generations. Our dances, our languages are how we interface with our past and demonstrate that our past is relevent to our present. Indeed, if a song or a custom has NO relevence to the present but is ONLY a relic of the past, we tend to instinctivly cast it aside and relegate it to a museum. I have found bellydance VERY relevent to me as a woman and as a vibrant, celebratory person. I choose BD rather than hip-hop, etc because through BD I connect with all the women of the past and to their celebrations. I am interfacing with human lineage, and that to me is what gives bellydance its resonance and texture.

I would categorize "modern" bellydance as a branch of folkloric dance that has adapted to the lives of people outside the original scope of its parent dances.

:)
AT
 

Maria_Aya

New member
I just love this conversation :D

My way of thinking it:

With the term Bellydance even in a class I mean the umbrella that cover's all the dance types inspired from arabian dance.

Under that exist 2 main categories:

Arabian dance from all arab countries, with under it 2 big categories, the traditional/folk and the social/performance type of the dance which is ofcourse inspired deeply by the traditional/folk, and where even the new things MUST be inside the principals of arabian oriental dance.

Now again under the big umbrella of Bellydance

Inspired from Arabian Dance.
There is no traditional form over here, but many many categories and sub-categories.
Here the dance is social/performing and there is more freedom from the dancers
It is a reflection of Arabian Dance that sometimes go so far that nothing reminds arabian dance. Here the dancer have more freedom and can do fusions.
So AmCab, Tribal, ATS, Fusion etc go under this umbrella for me.

At least this is the first intro way to teach it to my students when they seem lost not getting the styles etc and what is what.

There is also a sub category that have ethnical dances strongly connected with arabian dance: Greek Tsifteteli, Turkish Oryantal, Persian, Magreb Dances, etc.

Maria Aya:)
 
Last edited:

tim ema

New member
Maria Aya,

That is a VERY clear way of categorizing (for me, anyway!).

You have, in one quick posting, made the Oriental Dance "Family" MUCH less confusing! I was - like your students - quite muddled and have been reading this forum and googling, trying to find a "family tree" for BD.

Thank you so much!

:)
AT
 

Kiraze

New member
It may have something to do also with different languages and their nuances but I would never put Middle Eastern folk dances under the term "belly dance": for me haggala, houara, debke, horon etc are folk dances from different regions of Middle East and they have absolutely nothing to do with belly dance except the geographical origin. In my eyes belly dance is the performing art: mostly it is female solo dance with roots in Middle Eastern cultures and naturally also folk dances but it is no longer a folk dance itself.

I also do not think that belly dance is Arabic dance as there are so many non-arabic cultures who has a very long history with this dance and influences to different movements can be traced to regions like Africa, India and Central Asia which have absolutely nothing to do with Arabic culture... But I guess that we could argue without any correct answer whether belly dance came to Egypt from Turkey or to Turkey from Arabic countries or whatever :confused:
 

chryssanthi sahar

New member
One can argue about the roots of belly dance and where this dance appeared for the first time. There exist more speculations than facts about that. The fact is, that what we know as belly dance today, is mainly inspired by the Arabian dance or it is Arabian dance. Sure, there is also the Turkish style, but this becomes more and more adapted to the Arabian style (as well as the Greek style, due to the new Tsifteteli music and due to dancers like myself who create Greek-Arabian dance fusions;) ).
So I find Marias description and explanations very accurate. I think, it is a big help for people who are confused about the terms.
 
Top