Farasha Hanem
New member
Hi Farasha,
Yes I know about the other books of the OT but am not closely acquainted with all the details of Jewish law (though I did read at a bar mitzvah recently in the Torah sitting there in the --reform--temple that YHWH made some of his people eat their own babies as a punishment! :shok. What I was specifically wondering about is when the practice of animal sacrifice died out in the early Christian practice. Whether it was abandoned in the first century AD or later.
I think Communion is celebrated with bread and wine because that's what Jesus used at the last supper? Another thing to look up. Further to my previous point, I think most of the parables of Jesus are taught as metaphors but the "I am the Son of God" was interpreted at least by some quite literally along with "this is my body" and "this is my blood" sayings.
There are a lot of cannibalistic overtones in it all.
Hi, cathy. I came back on to check on my Shalwar Kameez thread before getting ready for work, and noticed your response. Gee, I kinda feel guilty, wondering if I've strayed us a tad off-topic! If the mods wish, do you want to start a new thread for this? Anyway, yes, Jesus did use bread and wine at the Last Supper, and some people do have a problem with it, because on the surface, it does seem like cannibalism, but that's not what it is at all. I believe the Catholics do believe that during their version of the Lord's Supper (holy communion), the bread and wine are transformed into the literal body and blood of Christ (my mother's side of the family are staunch Catholics, and I know this is what they believe). However, the bread and wine are only symbols; they merely represent the body and blood of Christ as it was broken on the Cross. Jesus did say, "This is my body," "This is my blood," but He was speaking metaphorically. Much of His teaching is symbolic. He took ordinary things from everyday life in order to teach a spiritual truth. As for when the sacrifices died out, let's just say they should have ended at the Cross, because He was the ultimate sacrifice prophesied from Genesis on through the Old Testament. However, the majority of the Jewish religious leaders of the day refused to recognize Christ as the prophesied Messiah, so yes, the sacrifices did go on for a time after His death, burial, and resurrection. The sacrifices probably ended either in A.D. 60, 70, or 80 (I'm writing from memory, so I can't remember the correct date oO;;;; ), 70! That's it! when Titus destroyed Jerusalem, or A.D. 160 or 180 (again, my memory fails me), when Israel as a country was destroyed for the next two millenia.
I'm so sorry I don't have time to double-check my information, but for now I have to get ready for work, and I work this afternoon from 2 til 11 this evening. If I get time this weekend, I'll brush up on my Bible and my historical facts. Thank you and A'isha for making this a very interesting discussion; it's very seldom that I talk about Christianity to anyone. I try to live it rather than to bang people over the head with it.
Last edited: