Duvet
Member
Has anyone else come across this idea?
I’ve been told that some female dancers don’t like following a male act because it’s harder to work the audience as she is seen as a bit of an anti-climax. Is that true? I’ve also been told that men don’t have to try – they just have to get up on stage, and they’ll get a good reaction. Is this a common perception? I view this as insulting, considering the hard work, practise, time and money that we all put into dancing, but it made me think.
So does a man, by the very fact of being a man, get a better reaction from the audience than a woman would, even if she put more time and effort into her performance? I am not suggesting that the male dancer doesn’t also put in the time and effort, nor has the skill, but I’m asking if, in general, there is a feeling that a man gets more back from the audience for what he does.
I personally feel that a good performer is a good performer –period. A bad performance looks bad – period. However, could it be that as most bums-on-seats at bellydance events tend to be female, a male dancer gets a different reaction, not about his ability, but just that there’s a man up there that women will watch, judge and pass comment on in a way they don’t do to another woman? He may also receive the ‘surprise’ reaction (hey, there’s a bloke and he’s not that bad), or the ‘encouragement’ factor (hey, there’s a bloke, isn’t he brave), as well as the ‘titillation’ factor. Of course, he may also be a very fine dancer and deserve the response he gets.
Does it depend on the type of audience you are performing before? Or is there nothing in it?
I’ve been told that some female dancers don’t like following a male act because it’s harder to work the audience as she is seen as a bit of an anti-climax. Is that true? I’ve also been told that men don’t have to try – they just have to get up on stage, and they’ll get a good reaction. Is this a common perception? I view this as insulting, considering the hard work, practise, time and money that we all put into dancing, but it made me think.
So does a man, by the very fact of being a man, get a better reaction from the audience than a woman would, even if she put more time and effort into her performance? I am not suggesting that the male dancer doesn’t also put in the time and effort, nor has the skill, but I’m asking if, in general, there is a feeling that a man gets more back from the audience for what he does.
I personally feel that a good performer is a good performer –period. A bad performance looks bad – period. However, could it be that as most bums-on-seats at bellydance events tend to be female, a male dancer gets a different reaction, not about his ability, but just that there’s a man up there that women will watch, judge and pass comment on in a way they don’t do to another woman? He may also receive the ‘surprise’ reaction (hey, there’s a bloke and he’s not that bad), or the ‘encouragement’ factor (hey, there’s a bloke, isn’t he brave), as well as the ‘titillation’ factor. Of course, he may also be a very fine dancer and deserve the response he gets.
Does it depend on the type of audience you are performing before? Or is there nothing in it?