Zorba
"The Veiled Male"
That's right - no argument.Dear Zorba,
Actually, there are scientists that would disagree that "movement has no gender". Although I can not remember much about it since it happened years ago, there is something about having both men and women lift a chair into their bodies from a certain poasition. It is something women can do but men can not, because the sexes balance differently through the upper portion of their bodies.
There are also differences in movement between males and females in more subtle ways. For example, while we both do walk, there is probably a difference in the mechanics of walking since in general women are broad through the pelvis and men through the shoulders. ( Notice the term "general, here"), which gives us different balance points in our normal gaits.
Now, tell me what this has to do with Belly Dance?
One of my favorite illustrations of this exact point: When I do maias, my hip structure causes them to have a different quality than, say, my (female) instructor. BUT - I can still do maias (vertical downward figure-8). I had to work hard to "break loose" my pelvis to be able to do them as male pelvises are not only narrower, but stiffer than female pelvises. However, since I was successful means that a maia is also a "masculine" movement.
You are also right about culture - there are some things that are essentially universal. Ok, fine. It is *still* artificial - to my admittedly idealist mind. You wouldn't believe the things I've read and/or been told that males shouldn't do in this dance (if indeed, they should do this dance at all). These include:
No veilwork, no maias or other side-to-side hip movements, no snake arms, no fringe on costumes, no bare bellies, no dancing on toe, no dancing on the diagonal, no dancing with arms overhead, no "dropped finger oriental hands", blah, blah, blah. What's left?
I ignore all that and follow my bliss...
Last edited: