she danced the "twist" for the most part, and switched to balady when the music changed, but I didn't see much "fusion" in there. And the people behind her are...... ROFLMAO!!
I wonder if you guys understand the context behind this little clip .. of a move from the 60.
Why make it what it is not ?? and add to the fusion confusion :lol: :lol:
I wonder if you guys understand the context behind this little clip .. of a move from the 60.
Why make it what it is not ?? and add to the fusion confusion :lol: :lol:
My apology, I thought it was clear from the clip what was going on since it doesn't have much dialect.
I haven't seen this movie, but as you can see. She bought a ticket to get into this nightclub. She was told by the man at the door she can get in because what she's wearing " Melaya laf " she pushed her way in but the waiters came in to kick her out claiming the place is for families/different class of people. She was asked by the audience can she do the twist she said she can't do the twist but she did it anyway .... no fusion
Life goes on .... :shok:
Okay, I could see that. Thought there was something else going on. By the way, remember what I said a while back about how nightclubs treat the traditional folks?
Anyway, this is fusion because at a certain point she started doing Baladi, to music that was a Rock and Roll, Balady fusion, then she did twist again. Fusion can take many different forms. Switching back and forth between two styles in the same routine is one possible form that fusion can take.
Okay, both of you, enough!
Tarik, why are you being snarky (also refered to as bitchiness)? These are female traits
To clarify this issue, she was not meant to be doing a fusion dance in this scene, despite the final outcome. That was not her intent (or the director's). She goes into the nightclub with her melaya, and because she gets confused she switches between the type of dance that she knows (baladi) and the other dance. She is actually supposed to be really bad at the twist and the people behind her are "the good dancers" making a mockery out of her. However, the final result IMHO is that the extras in the background are the ones looking hideous, not her. And I'm pretty sure that wasn't intended. Get it?
Tarik,
I did not read your reply to Masrawy with negativity, but thank you anyway. You were complaining in the past about females getting more privelages than male dancers because of "good traits", so I included a negative trait this time. Anyway, I was only joking with my last post, hence the *wink* in case you haven't noticed I chose to stay out of most arguments for months now and it feels a lot better this way.
I heard so much about the notorious Bin Rodi I had to go back and read that thread! Thanks for standing up to him and defending "her". But "she" and I are in good terms and I can't speak negatively about her. And I wish if both of you can makeup soon, because as far as I noticed if one of you posts in a thread, the other person stays out of the discussion, and this ruins it for other people who want both your input on the same topic.
Okay, going back to fusion :lol:, I am not going to argue something I don't know so well, but when I think about fusion someone like Nadia Gamal comes to mind. She had a very elegant feel to her dancing and she could do both styles equally good. And yes, I am very aware of Nagwa Fouad's infamous "fusions", the last one I saw almost had a devastating effect on me.
I was just explaining the scene in this movie which is predictable, for me at least, a common Egyptian woman gets caught in the wrong atmosphere and let us make a comedy scene out of it.
Tarik, why are you being snarky (also refered to as bitchiness)? These are female traits