Hi all,
In a very broad sense I agree that all arts including music, dance, poetry, painting, etc. spring from the same kind of creative energy that sex and all forms of social bonding spring from. I've even read that language itself was sexually selected for, in the sense that women preferred men who could chat them up first. Possibly dancing especially springs more from the sexual side of creative energy, given all the dances that originated in young men and women checking each other out.
Personally I would be flattered to be thought a sexy dancer. But that's not what's on my mind when I perform or go about putting together a choreography. What would I consider the highest compliments? Beautiful, talented, exactly with the music, choreography that exactly expressed the feeling of the music, great motor control, deep feeling.
I'm definitely not afraid of the terms sex, sexy, or sexuality.
I've read people say that Georgia O'Keefe's paintings of flowers are "about" female genitals, but as far as I know, she never said this. Or I've read critics say that Martin Scorsese's movies are "about" his lapsed Catholocism, yet he denies it. Where is the truth there? Who gets the greater say as to what the art is "about?" The artist or the public? Are there any other art forms (besides arguably pole dancing, porno films, etc) that are inherently about sex?
When you think about it, are there any schools of painting or music that are "about" sex? Yes, there are sexy paintings and sexy songs, but whole genres? And aside from porno films, there are certainly lots of sexy movies, but are there any film makers whose entire oeuvres are sexy?
I think that we as dancers choose how to define ourselves and yet viewers may see what they choose in our art.
And BTW I am proud to call myself a feminist. And I've been married (to a man) for 20 years now, and he's all for women's rights as well. That is, women as deserving of *equal rights* to those of men.
Cathy
In a very broad sense I agree that all arts including music, dance, poetry, painting, etc. spring from the same kind of creative energy that sex and all forms of social bonding spring from. I've even read that language itself was sexually selected for, in the sense that women preferred men who could chat them up first. Possibly dancing especially springs more from the sexual side of creative energy, given all the dances that originated in young men and women checking each other out.
Personally I would be flattered to be thought a sexy dancer. But that's not what's on my mind when I perform or go about putting together a choreography. What would I consider the highest compliments? Beautiful, talented, exactly with the music, choreography that exactly expressed the feeling of the music, great motor control, deep feeling.
I'm definitely not afraid of the terms sex, sexy, or sexuality.
I've read people say that Georgia O'Keefe's paintings of flowers are "about" female genitals, but as far as I know, she never said this. Or I've read critics say that Martin Scorsese's movies are "about" his lapsed Catholocism, yet he denies it. Where is the truth there? Who gets the greater say as to what the art is "about?" The artist or the public? Are there any other art forms (besides arguably pole dancing, porno films, etc) that are inherently about sex?
When you think about it, are there any schools of painting or music that are "about" sex? Yes, there are sexy paintings and sexy songs, but whole genres? And aside from porno films, there are certainly lots of sexy movies, but are there any film makers whose entire oeuvres are sexy?
I think that we as dancers choose how to define ourselves and yet viewers may see what they choose in our art.
And BTW I am proud to call myself a feminist. And I've been married (to a man) for 20 years now, and he's all for women's rights as well. That is, women as deserving of *equal rights* to those of men.
Cathy
Last edited: