Wow - TribalDancer, thanks for sharing all of that information with us. Don't worry about how long it was - I read it all and was fascinated.
maria harlequin - I love the vintage Jamila footage, especially the part where they're being taught the Turkish drop and Aida Al Adawi's solo at the end. I too wish I could see more Bal Anat footage from that time - I'm really intrigued by belly dance at that time in the US for some reason.
I don't really want to get into whether or not ATS is belly dance or not, because honestly I haven't completely decided for myself what I think since I am still rather new to all of this. However, it seems that much of this debate arises because ATS (and tribal) has evolved too far away in many peoples' opinion from what is considered "true" belly dance. So, I'm probably not going to articulate this well, but whenever I read these debates on this forum (as a long time lurker) it always brings to mind various comparisons, and of course, many people have already made some excellent ones.
The first one it brings to mind is language. I'll use English as an example. English spoken way back in say, 1400, would most certainly be unrecognizable to me if I time-traveled back to that year. Yet, it is still considered English. Just like British English, American English, Australian English, etc. are all spoken differently, and at times may have totally different words for the same thing, and at times we may not even understand each other even thought we are technically speaking the same language. And of course occasionally English borrows words from other languages and uses them as its own. And all of it falls under English (although I do realize that a language may diverge into two at some point), even though within it there are other headings such as "Old English," "Middle English," etc. It is a continually evolving language - an example would be how "old" words are removed and new words are added to English dictionaries. When it stops evolving it will be a dead language. That is one thing I remember from a linguistics class I took - living languages evolve, and I imagine it is very similar with dance. While it is being danced as part of our modern culture it will continue to change and that doesn't necessarily mean it is not belly dance (or that it is). That all said, I also think it is important to document how it (language, dance, etc.) was even as we go about changing it.
My second comparison has to do with rock 'n roll music - but after how much I just wrote, I think I'll leave that one for another time.
TribalBellieNE - I don't think you're a "knowledgeless hippy." I have noticed that people get very heated over the "great belly dance debate" but everyone is entitled to an opinion.
maria harlequin - I love the vintage Jamila footage, especially the part where they're being taught the Turkish drop and Aida Al Adawi's solo at the end. I too wish I could see more Bal Anat footage from that time - I'm really intrigued by belly dance at that time in the US for some reason.
I don't really want to get into whether or not ATS is belly dance or not, because honestly I haven't completely decided for myself what I think since I am still rather new to all of this. However, it seems that much of this debate arises because ATS (and tribal) has evolved too far away in many peoples' opinion from what is considered "true" belly dance. So, I'm probably not going to articulate this well, but whenever I read these debates on this forum (as a long time lurker) it always brings to mind various comparisons, and of course, many people have already made some excellent ones.
The first one it brings to mind is language. I'll use English as an example. English spoken way back in say, 1400, would most certainly be unrecognizable to me if I time-traveled back to that year. Yet, it is still considered English. Just like British English, American English, Australian English, etc. are all spoken differently, and at times may have totally different words for the same thing, and at times we may not even understand each other even thought we are technically speaking the same language. And of course occasionally English borrows words from other languages and uses them as its own. And all of it falls under English (although I do realize that a language may diverge into two at some point), even though within it there are other headings such as "Old English," "Middle English," etc. It is a continually evolving language - an example would be how "old" words are removed and new words are added to English dictionaries. When it stops evolving it will be a dead language. That is one thing I remember from a linguistics class I took - living languages evolve, and I imagine it is very similar with dance. While it is being danced as part of our modern culture it will continue to change and that doesn't necessarily mean it is not belly dance (or that it is). That all said, I also think it is important to document how it (language, dance, etc.) was even as we go about changing it.
My second comparison has to do with rock 'n roll music - but after how much I just wrote, I think I'll leave that one for another time.
TribalBellieNE - I don't think you're a "knowledgeless hippy." I have noticed that people get very heated over the "great belly dance debate" but everyone is entitled to an opinion.